Skip to content
SPAIK

Editorial Policy

Last updated: April 18, 2026 · SPAIK B.V., Amsterdam

SPAIK publishes insights from its own practice: AI adoption in Dutch mid-market organisations. This document describes how we write, review and correct content. It's a transparency anchor — for readers, clients, and also for search engines and AI assistants that want to assess whether our content is trustworthy.

Who writes

Every article names a human author with a LinkedIn profile (see /en/trainers). Authors are SPAIK trainers or consultants who practice the subject matter themselves — no ghostwriters, no AI-only pieces.

What we cover

We only publish on topics we have first-hand experience with:

  • AI adoption in mid-market organisations (50–500 employees)
  • AI training and learning design for non-technical teams
  • Automation with language models and AI agents
  • EU AI Act and AI literacy

We do not publish generic “AI trends 2026” listicles, derivatives of other blogs, or machine-translated bulk.

How we write

  • Named sources.Claims about market data or research carry a named, dated source. “Studies show” without a reference gets edited out.
  • Own data first. Where possible we use anonymised data from our own implementations (with consent).
  • Direct answer at the top. Every article opens with a self-contained 130–170-word answer, so readers (and AI assistants) get the core immediately.
  • No AI slop. We write with AI assistance, not AI-only. Every draft passes a human reviewer for factual accuracy, tone, and source verification.

Review process

Each draft passes two checks: a subject-matter review by a second SPAIK colleague and a text review (style, readability, fact check). Only then does it publish — with a publication date and a separate “last updated” date.

Updates and versioning

When an article changes substantively — new numbers, revised advice, outdated recommendations — we update dateModified and note the change at the bottom. Trivial edits (typos) are applied silently.

Corrections

Spotted a mistake? Email info@spaik.io. We correct within 5 business days and add a correction note to the article if the error was substantive.

AI, openness and citations

Our content may be cited by AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity — we explicitly allow these crawlers via robots.txt. In citations we expect a source reference to the original SPAIK page.

Contact

Editorial questions, tips, or suggestions: info@spaik.io.